• Contact
Posted by P.Drez on May 27th, 2010 under International, World Cup
Ah, Peter Crouch. This English phenomenon can be a divisive figure, but his awkward appearance too often blinds people to his tremendous skill and amazing scoring record. He deserves to start in South Africa.
Another England match, another goal for Peter Crouch. Sure, the one against Mexico yesterday was hardly artful, in fact, it was illegal on two fronts: handball and offside.
But to speak of that Mexican injustice misses the point. Peter Crouch somehow, someway finds the back of the net for England at an astonishing, befuddling, flabbergasting, headscratching, have-to-rub-your-eyes-twice-when-you-read-the-numbers-to-make-sure-your-vision-hasn’t-failed-you… rate: 21 goals in just 38 matches, and 17 in the 18 he’s started. Perplexing to say the least.
One of the most dimensionally-awkward players in the history of the sport, Crouch, on paper, should seemingly be a role player, one where when you’re pumping the ball in the box late in a game you’re losing, he can ruffle a few defenders and even grab the odd goal.
But that is not Peter Crouch. In his finest moments, Crouch is an outstanding center-forward. Yet, he is not simply a CF for which you simply whip crosses in and let him tower over defenders to pluck easy goals. In fact, his heading accuracy and power is lamentably below-average, particularly for a man of his enormous stature. Oddly enough, it is his feet that are his best attribute.
For the beanpole that he is (just being realistic here, people), you would never expect Crouch to have a deft first touch. But his touch is remarkably efficient, as his long frame disguises the distance at which the ball bounces off his foot, for he can quickly get a second touch on it due to his long legs. This ability allows him to be quite good at holding up play for fellow players to join the attack, and with the array of attacking talent at England’s disposal, such abilities from the man playing with Wayne Rooney up front could prove vital in South Africa.
That ability to drop deep could, of course, cause problems because Rooney likes to do the same, but with Crouch, England have a striker whom they can pump the ball long towards and cause defenders problems with his height (see Mexico), or another option to play the short ball while he is stationed deep, allowing Rooney to play higher to run onto passes from Gerrard or Lampard.
And Rooney can, frankly, play up top with anyone, as he is England’s most positionally-intelligent player. He can adapt to any striker he plays with, so fear not. Crouch simply provides more options for England (this without even mentioning the havoc he can wreak on set plays, particularly for teams lacking height).
The question for Capello is: what do you want that second CF to do? Because, sure, Emile Heskey can serve you as more of a battering ram, and can allow Rooney to impose himself on the match, but his hold-up play is a step below Crouch’s, and don’t even get started on actually putting the ball in the back of the net. The game is, and the World Cup this summer will be, determined by goals. And Crouch is simply on fire for his country in that department. So the question begs: a) Heskey, whom “Rooney plays better with?” Or b) a man that actually scores goals?
For England, Crouch has become a proficient finisher. Something about the international stage brings out the best in his scoring abilities, because at club level his numbers are quite pedestrian. In Liverpool’s 2006-07 run to the Champions League final, Crouch finished second to only Kaka (2007 world player of the year) in goals scored. Underscoring his surprising technical ability was his absolute stunner of a goal against Galatasary in the group stages that season. One of the great goals of the past decade:
There is something to these startling international statistics. In World Cup 2006, England won their first two matches with Crouch in the lineup alongside Michael Owen, scoring in the win over Trinidad and Tobago. In game three of the group phase, Rooney returned against Sweden, relegating Crouch to the bench. Crouch did not start again in the tournament as Sven-Goran Eriksson utilized Rooney as a lone striker to little effect.
Perhaps the reason Crouch excels in international settings is due to unfamiliarity. In England, clubs understand his abilities and his limits, they see him year in and year out. While there can be no doubt that the United States, Algeria and Slovenia will attempt to simulate defending Crouch in training (in the chance that he actually sees the field in SA), there is simply no player with his ridiculous height on the world stage, and simulation will prove fruitless because few players have his odd skill set. His 18 goals in 40 European appearances over the past 5 seasons, and his 21 goals in 38 England appearances prove that Europe and the rest of the world have found little success in stopping Crouch.
Even though soccer is hardly a game of statistics, another adage holds just as true: stats don’t lie. Peter Crouch scores goals for England, and it would be naive to see this stopping any time soon. He is a handful for defenses that don’t understand his unique game, and he gives England their best scoring option alongside their talisman Wayne Rooney. His record speaks for itself, and he deserves to start in South Africa.
What do you think? Leave comments below about your thoughts on the phenomenon that is Peter Crouch.
Bad Behavior has blocked 286 access attempts in the last 7 days.
magnusbleuveigner said:
May 27th, 2010 at 8:34 am
Is this where we leave the comments? Am I in the right place?
Nice write-up. Yeah, Crouch, although he reminds me of TIMMY!!, can ball. I’ve never understood it, and have often wondered how that gangly fool is a millionaire soccer player, and I’m no where close.
17 goals in 18 starts? You have to start him. I’ve got something that works 94% of the time, but I’m not sure if I want to use it. Not sound logic.
P. Drez, are you in Houston, Austin, or elsewhere? We should catch a game. I’ve drank with Toad, Vasherized, JungleFever, and the very blog lazy BrickTop.
Toadvine said:
May 27th, 2010 at 8:45 am
Well, Capello is loathe to start Darren Bent, who I think deserves to start up top with Rooney. Crouch is not exciting, but he’s also not likely to get in Rooney’s way. Rooney is England’s only real shot at this thing.
P.Drez said:
May 27th, 2010 at 8:57 am
Magnus – I’m from Austin but live in New York. I’m Huckleberry’s (Sef) brother… If you’re ever in the area let me know, and I’ll be back in Austin in October, maybe earlier, so we should catch a game.
Toadvine – I think Crouch brings more options than Bent, not to say I don’t like Bent, but Capello can’t take chances on players with very little international experience in a World Cup match. Defoe’s ahead of him in the pecking order anyway, although maybe that should be re-examined. He fell off at the end of the EPL season.
Toadvine said:
May 27th, 2010 at 9:01 am
Yeah, I just think Bent adds a lot of edge that will otherwise be missing from England’s squad. He can score, he’s big, he’s got more pace. Defoe is a joke.
P.Drez said:
May 27th, 2010 at 9:26 am
I used to really like Defoe, and thought he would be a future regular for England. Too damn inconsistent though, a very streaky player.
Vasherized said:
May 27th, 2010 at 9:48 am
Yes, you have to start Peter Crouch. He is a complete anomaly but one you can’t ignore and the numbers prove it.
Having said that, it is England in the World Cup so I fully expect him to come off the bench for mop up duty after Wayne Rooney and Theo Walcott disembowel our back line.
EnglishAg said:
May 28th, 2010 at 12:01 pm
Capello has played 4-4-2 pretty much the whole way through qualification. if he goes 4-4-2, expect Heskey to start alongside Rooney. Defences have to play deeper with him in the team as he still has some pace. Without the over the top threat, defences can push up and minimise space in the middle of the pitch. The 3 in the middle of the pitch (whoever gets picked) are not quick enough with the ball ala Xavi / Iniesta / Fabregas to make things tick in a compressed middle third.
However, the talk in the English press is that Rooney will start alone with Gerrard playing free behind. Lennon/Walcott will play on the right. The left is still up for grabs. I like Joe Cole on that side but I hope it is Adam Johnson.
Bent is unlikely to travel to SA – Hamstring problems have kept him out of training camp.
Sailor Ripley said:
June 1st, 2010 at 5:05 pm
Good article:
Bangers And Bolognese
magnusbleuveigner said:
June 2nd, 2010 at 6:38 am
Man, what’s the author of that article’s problem with Sweden? He failed to mention that the country of 58,000,000 hasn’t beaten “the nation of 7,000,000 skiers and hammer throwers” since 1950. That’s pretty embarrassing.
magnusbleuveigner said:
June 2nd, 2010 at 6:39 am
Atleast I think it’s 1950, maybe it was ’66. Either way, it was a long time ago.
Pitchmen | Blog | How Fabio Capello Blew it, and Why He Should Be Fired said:
June 29th, 2010 at 6:28 pm
[...] and say that Peter Crouch could not do as well as Heskey in opening up space for Rooney. Crouch provides more options than Heskey. He drops deep to open up space, he can play as a target man late in matches, and, oh wait, he [...]
My Soccer Pals | Blog | How Fabio Capello Blew it, and Why He Should Be Fired said:
June 30th, 2010 at 1:10 pm
[...] and say that Peter Crouch could not do as well as Heskey in opening up space for Rooney. Crouch provides more options than Heskey. He drops deep to open up space, he can play as a target man late in matches, and, oh wait, he [...]